Log in

Forex remote viewing

Forex remote viewing ,would have limitations. In fact during my tests I am convinced that that work, there is something, I was amazed to see the results. Even more the people which were doing the tests were also amazed.

However this is about something that exists. 

The speculative markets are about the future. And only God knows the future. Even if there are many incertanties it is an absolute necessity to make predictions. In fact the civilization is not possible without making predictions with reasonable chance of success. I am still thinking how to implement this technique in Forex. I have no doubts that it works, but this is something very specific.

Comments

  • CamaRon 2896 days ago

    I guess here is where intuition comes into the picture.

  • JohnLast 2896 days ago

    According to the remote viewing practicioners (RV) also known as TRV (technical remote viewing) there is a conexion within every individual with the whole. Some call the whole the matrix (lol) some call the whole the Akasha records http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akasha

    thing is that thr TRV is not always reliable.

    In this analys framework maybe the intuition is a high quality connexion with that framework or some kind of super computer.

     

     

  • JohnLast 2896 days ago

    Maybe the problem has something to do with the multiple universes. Well I am very deep in the matrix LOL. 

    http://www.farsight.org/demo/Multiple_Universes/Multiple_Universes_Experiment.html

     

  • CamaRon 2896 days ago

    Really interesting presentation.

  • JohnLast 2896 days ago

    If this theory is correct a precise forex prediction is impossible because of the multiple universes. That means that we are going to predict an outcome and that outcome can be fully predicted but we cannot know for sure if this is in our universe, or in a parallel time line, and each universe has its own EUR/USD and forex market, huh interesting.

    So when you use your intuition and you fail it is not because your intuition fail you but because you see an outcome in different time line (parallel universe).

    That explains way the straightforward approach or RV (Remote viewing) (using this short form makes me feel more competent) fail in general way. Once I got my google trained to search the keyword RV some interesting results appeared.

    http://www.jackhouck.com/arv.shtml

  • JohnLast 2895 days ago

    I have researched the work of Ed Dames about forex remote viewing. In his methodology he proposes to use associative remote viewing protocols. That means you should try to remote view two pictures. One is for buy the other is for sell. For example a buy is something like a piramid and for sell is something round like a dish. But beforehand you do not know the pictures and you do not know which what is associated with what. 

    So then you say I want to know the general direction of the Eur/Usd for the next day. I would use the Stochastic as trigger with parameters  Sto(5,3,3) (we have to mention the time frame, even if it is not in the recommendations). The signal would be transition from oversold or overbough or other way. All this has to be mentionned in the task.

    (you can mention any indicator you wish).

    And then you make the protocol.

    After that you have to distinguish what appears. And you should know that you are looking for buy or sell but the timing will be with your indicator trigger.

    I think that according to the multiple universe theory that would be an outcome just in one possible time line. What about the other time lines. The best thing we could do is to make this at least several time hoping that the multiple universal time lines would follow a statistical distribution and have for an example a simple Chi square test with one degree of freedom.

    The other way is to use a panel of people who are going to do the same thing. Evey one would go to one time line and as a sum they would give the most probable time line. This is how prediction would work. 

     

  • JohnLast 2895 days ago

    I have researched the work of Ed Dames about forex remote viewing. In his methodology he proposes to use associative remote viewing protocols. That means you should try to remote view two pictures. One is for buy the other is for sell. For example a buy is something like a piramid and for sell is something round like a dish. But beforehand you do not know the pictures and you do not know which what is associated with what. 

    So then you say I want to know the general direction of the Eur/Usd for the next day. I would use the Stochastic as trigger with parameters  Sto(5,3,3) (we have to mention the time frame, even if it is not in the recommendations). The signal would be transition from oversold or overbough or other way. All this has to be mentionned in the task.

    (you can mention any indicator you wish).

    And then you make the protocol.

    After that you have to distinguish what appears. And you should know that you are looking for buy or sell but the timing will be with your indicator trigger.

    I think that according to the multiple universe theory that would be an outcome just in one possible time line. What about the other time lines? The best thing we could do is to make this at least several times (several dozens) hoping that the multiple universal time lines would follow a statistical distribution and have for an example a simple Chi square test with one degree of freedom. For this every protocol should be not very coplicated the traditional lenght would be impractical.

    The other way is to use a panel of people who are going to do the same thing. Every one would go to one time line and as a sum they would give the most probable time line. This is how prediction would work. 

     

  • CamaRon 2895 days ago

    For those of us that are even remotely interested, all we have to do is test it, and post the results and experiences here. After all, we have to start somewhere. And I don't believe in over-complicating it. Many " what ifs" will only hamper our intuitions.

  • JohnLast 2895 days ago

    It does not look like something for everybody. We may be trapped in a hell house of illusions.

    I wonder even if tests would prove anything. It is about fringe science psychonautes and I comment things only in a relatively closed circle. 

  • JohnLast 2895 days ago

    I think I should design a completely different protocol for the Forex tests. 

  • JohnLast 2894 days ago

    According to Ed the Remote viewing is just one piece of information you need at least three intelligence indenpendent sources in order to take action. That should apply in Forex you can't use remote viewing as only one way of prediction.