beathespread

• • jaguar1637@jaguar1637

  

  someone "codebreaker" wrote this and it's pertinent

  By jaguar1637 3591 days ago Comments (1)

  someone "codebreaker "wrote this and it's pertinent
• • jaguar1637@jaguar1637

  

  Figuring out how to scan the cycles => ANTICIPATION

  By jaguar1637 3667 days ago Comments (26)

  • GOERTZEL

  Figuring out how to scan the cycles => ANTICIPATION

No bookmarks

• 

  bartel explanation

  By jaguar1637 3271 days ago

  • bartel explanation

  from this link http://www.cyclesresearchinstitute.org/cycles-general/bartel.pdf

• • jaguar1637@jaguar1637

  

  jaguar1637 commented on the blog Figuring out how to scan the cycles => ANTICIPATION 3263 days ago

  Hi Raj,  EPF ? can you tell me more about EPF ?
• • Raj Svrinisan@Raj4x

  

  Raj Svrinisan commented on the blog Figuring out how to scan the cycles => ANTICIPATION 3263 days ago

  Nice work Boxter. EPF is mandatory for tools such as Goertzel. And a good Bartels test as well. While at it, you might consider, if you have not already done so, to add Cycle Strength, since many believe the cycle with largest Amplitude is dominant....
• • jaguar1637@jaguar1637

  

  jaguar1637 uploaded the file bartel explanation 3271 days ago

  from this link http://www.cyclesresearchinstitute.org/cycles-general/bartel.pdf
• • Boxter@Boxter

  

  Boxter commented on the blog Figuring out how to scan the cycles => ANTICIPATION 3388 days ago

  Hi there, I checked the Bartels test of the R lawstat package once more (http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lawstat/lawstat.pdf ) . This Bartels test is NOT the cycle significance test ! It is the Bartels test for randomness which is...

No topics have been created.

No pages created yet

No videos posted yet.